Serious Issue

July 11, 1997

To the editor:

Solving subsistence requires understanding, but there is no other issue facing Alaska today that will have a more substantial impact on our future. Subsistence means sustenance; livelihood; existence. It is survival. We each have our own methods.

The whole argument over welfare reform was based on whether or not people who are able should provide for their own existence. Welfare was an entitlement, and many people chose that way to subsist. Changes now require that those who are able must work. Misunderstanding of the subsistence issue stems from the mistaken belief that surviving on the wild harvest is not work.

Alaska has long been a hunting and fishing dream location. The successful co-existence of those surviving on the wild harvest with sport and personal use hunters and fishers depend on a successful management system. Intensive management by protecting and enhancing habitat, predator control and scientific knowledge to maintain health and abundance of all species is available. Only Alaskan management can accomplish this. All users of the wild harvest can live in harmony for years to come, but first, we must practice understanding. Memories of failed federal management of our fish and game resources gives impetus to a solution.

Surviving on the wild harvest is for a minority of our citizens and not the faint of heart. The term "rural" is provocative without more specific definition relating to dependence on the wild harvest. Where you live, in some cases, does mandate dependence on wild harvest. In Alaska, the term rural is too general. Whatever the final solution is, it must develop fairness and respect.

I applaud the efforts of the task force who have battled the words for a solution, particularly Speaker Gail Phillips. She understands the seriousness of the issue and compromise is her specialty. The draft required intense determination and respect for all Alaskans. Now we need a peace process. Peace is defined as "absence of conflict." Conflict is removed by submission or shared compromise. Certainly, compromise is preferable. It is time to get serious about this.

Sincerely,

Rep. Jeannette James
North Pole