|
|
|
||||
|
|
Home Rule Villages An Act relating to villages; and providing for an effective date.
Updated: March 3, 2000 The Community and Regional Affairs Committee Substitute for House Bill 255 is intended to allow an existing second class city, or unincorporated area, to form a “home rule community” government structure under state law. The city or area would be allowed, through the charter system, to flexibly define its scope of governing powers and services to meet specific area needs. For instance, a community charter may be drafted to provide for police or fire protection services while leaving transportation issues in the state purview. Under the provision of their charter, a local government may assume any of a wide range of powers, from alcohol and animal control to airport and public works management. Currently, all home rule governments are required to meet strict financial auditing requirements, provide land-use, zoning and platting services and constitute their own school district. The proposed substitute for House Bill 255 removes these requirements* allowing smaller communities to share in the strength and flexibility of the charter system while avoiding some the thickest red tape. The goal: greater self-determination and a more locally relevant government structure. A new charter-base home rule community may be the best option for unincorporated areas that would not be viable under the second class city model. Existing second class cities which are strained by general law requirements may find relief in a more narrowly crafted charter that allowed them to forego services beyond their capability while accepting responsibility for local needs that can be met with local resources. Please feel free to contact my office with questions or concerns. *Financial statements are required in lieu of a full audit. Land use, zoning and platting may be done, but are not required. A home rule community would not constitute a school district. |
||||