|
|
District M - Republican |
||||
|
|
Sponsor Statement for SB 13
Updated: December 17, 1998 A great deal of controversy and total lack of consensus has surrounded the allocation of Alaska's salmon stocks. These allocative battles have left all user groups unsatisfied and have been to the detriment of the sustained yield of some population segments, and to the genetic diversity of the overall population. Current salmon management centers around heavy exploitation of mixed stock fisheries and disregards the negative effects this policy has on discrete stocks of all salmon species. Not until we recognize the importance of implementing an assessment plan for discrete salmon stocks, based on the necessary information, can we fulfill our constitutional obligation to preserve the sustained yield of all stocks of the resource. The need for this change in management philosophy and implementation of a discrete salmon stock assessment policy is heavily supported by information from the scientific community. The National Research Council of the National Academy of Science assembled the leading experts in the field of salmon management and published Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest, in December 1995. An extensive review by leading experts to analyze data on salmon stocks, their decline and options for intervention supports the need for discrete stock assessment. The following is excerpted from their findings:
The conclusion of this report points out the potential deficiency in Alaska's current management philosophy and supports the need for the discrete salmon stock assessment policy. The experts conclude:
In order to uphold our Constitutional mandate to provide for sustained yield, we cannot afford to ignore the biological realities and maintain the status quo. The passage of SB 13 is intended to redirect our attention from the past mistakes of allocation driven management system toward a system which will fully meet our constitutional responsibility to sustained yield. |
||||