|
|
|
||||
|
|
Physician Negotiations with Health Insurers
Updated: February 10, 2000 Senate Bill 256 attempts to level the playing field for Alaska's patients and the physicians who care for them. In a perfect world, equal bargaining power would exist between the medical care providers and the health insurers. Big hospitals have more equal bargaining power with the health insurers than the typical Alaskan physician in a solo or small group practice. Obviously, a gross inequity in bargaining power exists and there is no conceivable way any health insurer will bargain with an individual doctor regarding individual contract provisions other than on a take it or leave it basis. The resultant effect is physician service contracts heavily weighted in favor of the insurance company. The bottom line is that, in many respects, this adversely affects the care that patients receive. For example, requiring a physician to use a lower cost treatment when a higher cost treatment may be medically necessary or preventing a physician from discussing alternative treatments. Independent, competing physicians are prevented from any collective action by the federal anti-trust laws to which, ironically, the insurers are not subject. This fact plus the market concentration of health insurers causes the imbalance in bargaining power. With insurers having such a high degree of leverage, a balance of interest no longer exists in the market for health care delivery and finance. Senate Bill 256 can permit independent, competing physicians to collectively negotiate with health insurers in regard to the provisions of physician services contracts to provide quality health care to Alaskans. When the provisions set forth in SB 256 are met, behavior that would otherwise violate the anti-trust laws will be exempt from antitrust scrutiny. The test for qualifying exemption varies depending on the identity of the party performing the action in question. But SB 256 will still prohibit a group of independent competing physicians from striking or otherwise engaging in activities that would result in a boycott. | Top | Senator Pete Kelly's Page | |
||||